Jump to content

User talk:Tournasol7

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 9 hours ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion (03 December 2025)
 
My main page
 
Discuss
 Quality images 
Quality images
 Featured pictures 
Featured pictures
 Valued pictures 
Valued pictures
 


Quality Image Promotion (16 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Judoc church in Bielefeld (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suesterkirche in Bielefeld (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:47, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theater am Alten Markt in Bielefeld (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 39 in Mindelheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrstrasse 1 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:54, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gruftkapelle in Mindelheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hungerturm in Mindelheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberes Tor in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (17 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at the Lorsch Abbey (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torhalle in Lorsch (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (18 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbey of Lorsch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall of the Abbey of Lorsch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tithe barn at the Lorsch Abbey (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (19 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alter Markt 3 in Bielefeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gehrenberg 2 in Bielefeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obernstrasse 51 in Bielefeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:57, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Castle of L'Isle-de-Noe (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of L'Isle-de-Noe (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (20 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marstall in Sigmaringen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 02:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 6 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheNuggeteer 13:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosse Domsfreiheit 16 in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hakenstrasse 4a in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 1-2 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 7 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TheNuggeteer 13:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (21 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 14 in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:25, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Quedlinburg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:25, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktstrasse 9 in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktstrasse 15 in Quedlinburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Benedict church in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prinzenbau in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landeshaus in Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (22 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Wache in Northeim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entenmarkt 14 in Northeim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haeuserstrasse 1 in Northeim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visitation of the Virgin Mary church in Northeim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sixtus church in Northeim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (24 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesuit church in Mannheim (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:28, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konkordienkirche in Mannheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:50, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musikschule in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:28, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeughaus in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:28, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskirche in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:28, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruehl 21 in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruehl 29 in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 20 in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osterstrasse 1a in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Plage de Cluny (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plage de Cluny (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Auch cathedral (49).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Auch cathedral (49).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (26 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Lorsch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nibelungenstrasse 41 in Lorsch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klosterkirche in Lorsch (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lorsch Abbey (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torhalle in Lorsch (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nibelungenstrasse 34 in Lorsch (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulstrasse 3 in Lorsch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roemerstrasse 12 in Lorsch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 - Croatian Selection

[edit]

Congratulations! It is with great pleasure that we inform you that your photograph, has won the 5th place in the national competition Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 - Croatian Selection! We sincerely congratulate you on your outstanding work and contribution! Your photograph stands out for its quality and the beautiful presentation of Croatian cultural heritage. We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude for participating in the contest. Every photograph submitted is an invaluable contribution to free knowledge, helping to preserve and showcase the richness of our heritage to the world via Wikimedia Commons. Once again, our sincere congratulations, and we hope you will participate again next year! Best regards, The Wiki Loves Monuments Croatia Organizing Team Fraxinus (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fraxinus; thank you very much! Croatia is very beautiful country and surely I return there for take some picture of Croatian cultural heritage :) Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (27 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Charles Frederick in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:04, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konkordienkirche in Mannheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musikschule in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torhalle in Lorsch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulstrasse 17 in Lorsch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (28 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James the Greater church in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (29 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoken 3 in Quedlinburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:48, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lange Gasse 24 in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lange Gasse 26a in Quedlinburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:48, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lange Gasse 32 in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of St Michael church in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Science Competition 2025

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019, Wiki Science Competition 2021 and Wiki Science Competition 2023, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2025 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2025, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Chile or Bangladesh), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2026.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2025 #WikiScience #WikiScience2025


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery --08:44, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (30 November 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lange Gasse 29 in Quedlinburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (01 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Welle 50 in Bielefeld (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Welle 61 in Bielefeld (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:36, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episcopal chancellery in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Priesterseminar in Osnabrueck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 12:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 12:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domhof 6 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 6 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 1-2 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (02 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Aachen (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Foillan church in Aachen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (17).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (17).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (03 December 2025)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junkernstrasse 9 in Herzberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:59, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzgraben 1-3 in Aachen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Bielefeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:57, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply