Commons:Graphic Lab/Video and sound workshop
Appearance
| Illustration Workshop | Map Workshop | Photography Workshop | Video and Sound Workshop |
Video and sound workshop
This workshop is part of the Graphic Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.
This specific page is the requests page for the Video and Sound Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a video or sound to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Make a request
Show manual procedures
Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):
<gallery> IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one) ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though </gallery> ;Request: : Details of your request go here… --~~~~ ;Graphist opinion(s):
See also
[edit]| SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 185 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2025. | |
Rotate video without losing quality
[edit]- Request
- This video was originally uploaded upside down. I tried to rotate this 180⁰, The file was rotated to current rotation but loses file size to almost half of what it was before. Can this be rotated from first revision to current position (180⁰) but without losing size.—KEmel49(📝,📤) 19:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- It's okay to see a file reduce in size; all modern video codecs are compressed with some degree of detail lost.
- The only standard on quality is determined by your eyes: if it looks indistinguishable (or 'good enough') than the original file, then the file size doesn't matter. IrisChronomia (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- P.S. - generally speaking, you can spend more computational power to get a less lossy (more details preserved) video at the same size.
- Spending 5 minutes compressing a 30-second video can yield a very small file with outstanding visual quality. A recording camera don't have that level of performance to spare, so they use minimal compression, relying on huge file sizes to preserve the details. IrisChronomia (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- @IrisChronomia, Now i got it why 1 minute of 30fps 720p recorded videos are 40 or 50 MB in my device. Probably need to compress externally.—KEmel49(📝,📤) 16:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
- @KEmel49: Can you try rotating it using http://ezgif.com/rotate-video? cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 14:40, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmglee I tried withthe very first version, still lost size to half.—KEmel49(📝,📤) 13:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- It might be because the original was saved at an overly low compression for performance reasons. File:Canalul_Mila_35_video_02.webm also lost about half its size without perceptible quality loss. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 14:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- P.S. Asked on en:Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#Rotating_and_saving_a_video_reduces_file_size_by_half cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 14:14, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmglee I tried ezgif.com and it was 5.27 MB in size, i think current version is ok too (5.16 MB). Compression in size is not visible in video quality so let it be. BTW Thanks for your suggestion.—KEmel49(📝,📤) 15:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- It might be because the original was saved at an overly low compression for performance reasons. File:Canalul_Mila_35_video_02.webm also lost about half its size without perceptible quality loss. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 14:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Bird call drowned out by traffic noise
[edit]-
Bird call drowned out by traffic noise
Article(s):
- Request
- Can the traffic noise be removed? - MPF (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Please convert MP4 to AV1 webm just under 100 MiB
[edit]Article(s):
- Request
- To illustrate lunar south pole illumination, I found this NASA simulation at http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5027. As MP4 format is unacceptable, I converted it to VP9 webm with
ffmpeg -y -i sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.mp4 -vf "setpts=2.5*PTS" -r 12 -c:v libvpx-vp9 -crf 37 sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.webm
(37 was the lowest crf yielding a file under 100 mebibytes, Wikimedia Commons' upload limit for subsequent versions).
- I would've preferred the AV1 codec as one gets higher video quality for the same filesize, but when I replaced
libvpx-vp9withlibaom-av1in the command above, I got Overriding packet duration by frame rate, this should not happen errors.
- Can someone please convert the original MP4 to an AV1 webm at 12 frames per second (so that the animation runs at 1 day per second) at the lowest crf setting (i.e. highest quality) that makes the file under 100 MiB?
- Thanks, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 13:03, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks to JayCubby (talk · contribs) who did it as per user_talk:JayCubby#File:Sp_illum_10deg_2025_1080p30.webm. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 17:00, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Resolved- Always happy to help! JayCubby (talk) 17:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
